(PC) Gordon v. Ramirez-Palmer, et al, No. 2:2002cv02454 - Document 106 (E.D. Cal. 2006)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 9/27/06. Dfts' motion for summary judgment 81 is GRANTED and judgment is to be entered for dfts. CASE CLOSED (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Gordon v. Ramirez-Palmer, et al Doc. 106 Case 2:02-cv-02454-GEB-GGH Document 106 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY GORDON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. ANNA M. RAMIREZ-PALMER, et al., Defendants. 15 16 2:02-cv-2454-GEB-GGH-P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On August 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On 22 September 12, 2006, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file objections until September 23 20, 2006. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:02-cv-02454-GEB-GGH 1 2 3 Document 106 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2006, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed on December 30, 2005, is 4 granted and judgment is to be entered for defendants. 5 Dated: September 27, 2006 6 7 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.