(PC) Cohea v. Pliler, et al, No. 2:2000cv02799 - Document 177 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/6/2009, 174 in full; Defendants' 149 motion to dismiss the claims against defendants Flory, Hill, Kelly, Rosario, Saunders, Scogin, Sims and White, is GRAN TED; Plaintiff's 153 motion for reconsideration, filed with his brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss, is DENIED; Plaintiff's 151 motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED; and Plaintiff's 160 , 161 , 163 Requests are DENIED. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cohea v. Pliler, et al Doc. 177 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANNY JAMES COHEA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD EFB P vs. CHERYL K. PLILER, Warden, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On March 13, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On 22 March 31, 2009, this court adopted the findings and recommendations. However, on March 30, 2009, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and 23 24 recommendations which were not docketed by the Clerk prior to issuance of the March 31 order. 25 Accordingly, the March 31, 2009 order adopting the findings and recommendations is vacated. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Nonetheless, after reviewing the file and plaintiff’s objections, the court again 1 2 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate 3 judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2009, are adopted in full; 5 2. Defendants’ December 20, 2007 motion to dismiss the claims against 6 defendants Flory, Hill, Kelly, Rosario, Saunders, Scogin, Sims and White, is GRANTED; 7 8 3. Plaintiff’s January 14, 2008 motion for reconsideration, filed with his brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss, is DENIED; 9 10 11 12 4. Plaintiff’s December 28, 2007 motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED; and 5. Plaintiff’s February 11, 2008 and February 25, 2008 requests are DENIED. DATED: April 6, 2009. 13 14 15 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
