(HC)(DP) Proctor v. Wong, et al, No. 2:1996cv01401 - Document 303 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING in Full 226 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/16/09. Petitioner's Rule 56(f) motion 185 and 186 is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment 189 is DENIED in its entirety. Respon dents' motion for summary judgment 176 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART without prejudice, as outlined in the May 15, 2007, f&r's. Claims A, C, D, F, G, H, J, K (to the extent not already dismissed), L, M,N, O, Q, R, and S are DENIED on the merits.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(HC)(DP) Proctor v. Wong, et al Doc. 303 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM A. PROCTOR, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. CIV S-96-1401-JAM-CMK DEATH PENALTY CASE vs. ORDER ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., et al., 15 Respondents. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of 20 California local rules. 21 On May 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 23 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 24 been filed. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2007, are adopted in 8 2. Petitioner’s Rule 56(f) motion (Docs. 185 and 186) is denied; 9 3. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 189) is denied in its 4. Respondents’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 176) is granted in part 7 10 11 full; entirety; 12 and denied in part without prejudice, as outlined in the May 15, 2007, findings and 13 recommendations; and 14 5. Claims A, C, D, F, G, H, J, K (to the extent not already dismissed), L, M, 15 N, O, Q, R, and S are denied on the merits. 16 DATED: April 16, 2009 17 18 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.