(PC) Thompson, et al v. Wilson, et al, No. 2:1996cv00297 - Document 103 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/20/09 ORDERING that the 102 findings and recommendations filed November 19, 2008, are adopted in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Thompson, et al v. Wilson, et al Doc. 103 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES THOMPSON, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 2:96-cv-0297-GEB-DAD-P vs. GRAY DAVIS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER / 17 Plaintiffs are two state prisoners proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On November 19, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No 23 objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff Thompson’s copy of the findings 25 and recommendations was returned, plaintiff Thompson was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local 2 Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 3 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 4 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 5 ORDERED that: 6 7 8 9 10 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 19, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110. Dated: January 20, 2009 11 12 13 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
