(HC) (DP) Webster v. Ornoski, et al, No. 2:1993cv00306 - Document 484 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/3/2014 ORDERING: Respondent's objections to the findings and recommendations due on or before 7/21/2014; Respondent's reply to petitioner's objections due on or before 8/5/2014; and Petitioner's reply to Respondent's objections due on or before 8/11/2014/(Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) (DP) Webster v. Ornoski, et al Doc. 484 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY JUNIOR WEBSTER, Case No. 2:93-CV-00306-LKK-DAD (HC)(DP) 12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER AND REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 14 15 S.W. ORNOSKI, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Respondent in this capital federal habeas case has submitted a request to modify the 19 scheduling order issued June 4, 2014, regarding objections to the findings and recommendations 20 filed that same day. Counsel for Petitioner opposes the request. 21 Good cause appearing, the scheduling order for filing Respondent’s objections to the 22 findings and recommendations and for filing replies to objections to the findings and 23 recommendations is modified as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 1. Respondent’s time to file objections to the findings and recommendations shall be extended two weeks, to on or before July 21, 2014; 2. Respondent’s time to file a reply to Petitioner’s objections to the findings and recommendations shall be extended two weeks, to on or before August 5, 2014; 3. Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s objections to the findings and recommendations 1 [Proposed] Order Revised Briefing Schedule (2:93-CV-00306-LKK-DAD (HC)(DP)) Dockets.Justia.com 1 shall be filed on or before August 11, 2014. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: July 3, 2014. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order Revised Briefing Schedule (2:93-CV-00306-LKK-DAD (HC)(DP))
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
