Alo v. Ramos, No. 1:2023cv00663 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action, Without Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/2/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Lawrence, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 14 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB ALCAPONE ALO, v. (Docs. 1, 4) ASHLEY RAMOS, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 21 forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 1, 2023. 22 (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 23 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. 24 On June 29, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 25 recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 26 4.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-one days in which to file objections to the findings and 27 recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and no objections have been filed. 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley 1 1 United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of 2 the case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court finds the Findings and 3 Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. 6 The Findings and Recommendations dated June 29, 2023 (Doc. 4), are ADOPTED IN FULL. 7 2. The Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. 8 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this action. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2023 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.