Scoggins v. Falcon Court et al, No. 1:2022cv01542 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing this Action, signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 07/20/2023. CASE CLOSED.(Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANELLE SCOGGINS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. FALCON COURT, et al., No. 1:22-cv-01542-ADA-EPG ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION (ECF No. 6) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Danelle Scoggins (“Plaintiff”), proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced 18 this civil action on December 1, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to the assigned 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 3, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint, 21 concluding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 4.) The screening order 22 directed Plaintiff to either file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) or notify the Court in writing 23 that she wished to stand on her complaint within thirty days of service. (Id. at 10.) To date, Plaintiff 24 has failed to comply with the Court’s order. 25 On April 27, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 26 recommending that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute and for 27 failure to comply with the Court’s order. (ECF No. 6.) The findings and recommendations 28 contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (Id. at 6.) 1 1 To date, Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 2 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the 3 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 4 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations filed on April 27, 2023, (ECF No. 6), are 6 ADOPTED in FULL; 7 2. This case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and 8 comply with the Court’s order; and 9 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 20, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.