(HC) Quair v. Skiles, No. 1:2022cv01386 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations Dismissing the Petition Without Prejudice and Directing the Clerk of Court to Close the Case, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/18/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Quair v. Skiles Doc. 8 Case 1:22-cv-01386-JLT-CDB Document 8 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:22-cv-01386-JLT-CDB (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING THE PETITION WITHOUT PREJDUICE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE Respondent. (Doc. 7) v. JON M. SKILES, 16 17 The assigned magistrate judge screened the petition filed in this action and observed that 18 Petitioner failed to name an appropriate respondent and failed to state a cognizable claim and noted 19 that Petitioner admits he has not exhausted state judicial remedies. 20 the magistrate judge recommended the petition be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if Petitioner 21 exhausted his administrative remedies. (See id. at 5.) 22 (Doc. 7.) (Id. at 3-5.) Therefore, Petitioner was granted 30 days to file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations, 23 which was served to the address on record on November 18, 2022. (Doc. 7 at 6.) In addition, 24 Petitioner was informed the “failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 25 appeal the District Court’s order.” (Id. at 6, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 26 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) Petitioner did not file objections or 27 otherwise respond to the Findings and Recommendations, and the deadline to do so has expired. 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-01386-JLT-CDB Document 8 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 2 are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 3 1. ADOPTED in full. 4 5 2. 6 7 The Findings and Recommendations dated November 18, 2022 (Doc. 7) are Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2023 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
