(HC) Gray v. The People, No. 1:2022cv01284 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing Clerk of Court to close case and declining to issue Certificate of Appealability 1 , 5 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/21/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 GEORGINA NARDONE, on behalf of I.F. (a minor), Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1444 JLT SKO ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED, AND THE ACTION BE REMANDED TO THE ACTING COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (Docs. 15, 19, 21) 18 19 Georgina Nardone filed a complaint on behalf of her minor child I.F. under 42 U.S.C. § 20 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her 21 application for Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that 22 23 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that Defendant’s motion for summary 24 judgment be denied. (Doc. 21.) The magistrate judge recommended that the action be remanded to the 25 Acting Commissioner for further proceedings because the ALJ’s finding that I.F. was a “preschooler” 26 on the application date was harmful error. 27 28 1 On July 9, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi was named Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. She is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in [their] official capacity, be the proper defendant.”). 1 1 The Court granted the parties 14 days from the date of service to file objections to the 2 recommendation of the magistrate judge. (Doc. 21 at 12.) The Court advised the parties “that failure 3 to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the district judge’s order.” 4 (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 834 (9th Cir. 2014)). Thus, any objections were due 5 no later than November 17, 2022. To date, no objections have been filed. 6 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 7 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed 8 the matter, the Court finds the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper 9 analysis. Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 10 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2022 (Doc. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL. 11 12 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. 13 3. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED. 14 4. This matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this decision. 15 16 5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Georgina 17 Nardone, on behalf of minor child I.F., and against Defendant Acting Commissioner of 18 Social Security, and to CLOSE this action. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 21, 2022 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.