(HC) Lafond v. Arviza, No. 1:2022cv00786 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 9/14/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAOUL LAFOND, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 1:22-cv-00786-ADA-HBK (HC) v. M. ARVIZA, 15 Respondent. 16 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE (Doc. Nos. 1, 10) 17 18 Petitioner Raoul Lafond is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 21 302. 22 On July 14, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 23 recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable habeas 24 claim. (Doc. No. 10.) Those findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and 25 contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. 26 (Id.) As of the date of this order, petitioner has not filed objections, and the deadline for doing so 27 has passed. 28 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court holds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, 5 1. 6 adopted in full; 7 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is dismissed; and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. The findings and recommendations issued on July 14, 2022, (Doc. No. 10) are 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.