(PC) Callins v. Mason, et al, No. 1:2022cv00603 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff's sexual assault and retaliation claims against Defendant Kyt and failure to protect claim against Defendants Manson, Flores, Zamora and Garrison and all other Defe ndants and claims be dismissed from the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief ; referred to Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; new case number is 1:22-cv-00603 JLT-SAB (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/28/2022. (Objections to F&R due within 14-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CARLTON RAY CALLINS, Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION v. 12 13 Case No. 1:22-cv-00603-SAB (PC) C. MASON, et al., 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. 15 (ECF No. 16) 16 17 Plaintiff Carlton Ray Callins is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On September 21, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and 20 found that he stated a cognizable claim against Defendant Kyt for sexual assault and retaliation, 21 and against Defendants Manson, Flores, Zamora and Garrison for failure to protect from the 22 sexual assault. (ECF No. 15.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. 23 Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file a second amended complaint or notify the Court of 24 his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On November 23, 2022, 25 Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (ECF No. 16.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a District 1 2 Judge to this action 3 Further, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 4 1. This action proceed on Plaintiff’s sexual assault and retaliation claims against 5 Defendant Kyt and failure to protect claim against Defendants Manson, Flores, 6 Zamora and Garrison; and 2. 7 All other Defendants and claims be dismissed from the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. 8 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 9 10 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 11 (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file 12 written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 13 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 14 within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 15 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 16 1991)). 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: November 28, 2022 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
