(PC) Coleman v. Unknown, No. 1:2022cv00303 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Pay the Required Filing Fee, Failure to Prosecute, and Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/28/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Lawrence, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORLANDO COLEMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:22-cv-00303-DAD-SAB (PC) v. UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PAY THE REQUIRED FILING FEE, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. No. 10) 17 Plaintiff Orlando Coleman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 18 19 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 1, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 22 recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a 23 court order, failure to pay the required filing fee, and failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 24 10.) Those pending findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice 25 that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 3–4.) 26 To date, no objections have been filed and the time in which to do so has now passed. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly: 5 1. 6 7 The findings and recommendations issued on June 1, 2022 (Doc. No. 10) are adopted in full; 2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a 8 court order, failure to pay the required filing fee, and failure to prosecute this 9 action; and 10 11 12 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
