(PC)Jesus Ramirez v. CDCR, No. 1:2022cv00182 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations to dismiss action, without prejudice, for failure to obey court order and failure to prosecute 10 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/15/2022. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC)Jesus Ramirez v. CDCR Doc. 11 Case 1:22-cv-00182-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 05/16/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS RAMIREZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:22-cv-00182-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. (Doc. 10) v. CDCR, 16 17 Plaintiff Jesus Ramirez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 15, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order directing Plaintiff to 21 submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee to 22 proceed with this action. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s 23 order would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) Plaintiff did respond to the Court’s order or 24 otherwise communicate with the Court. 25 Therefore, on April 18, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 26 recommending dismissal of this action, without prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and 27 failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. 10.) Those findings and recommendations were served on 28 Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen days 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-00182-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 05/16/22 Page 2 of 2 1 after service. (Id. at 3.) No objections have been filed, and the deadline to do so has now passed. 2 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 3 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 4 the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 5 analysis. 6 Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 7 1. 8 9 adopted in full; 2. 10 11 The findings and recommendations issued on April 18, 2022, (Doc. 10), are This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 15, 2022 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.