Williams v. Messa et al, No. 1:2021cv01660 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/20/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:21-cv-01660-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ABAGAIL MESSA, et al., (Doc. No. 7) Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 19 this civil action on November 17, 2021. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On July 21, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that (1) plaintiff’s federal claims in this action be dismissed, with prejudice, based 23 on plaintiff’s failure to state a claim, failure to obey the court’s order, and failure to prosecute; (2) 24 the court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s purported state law claims; 25 and (3) plaintiff’s state law claims be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. No. 7.) The findings 26 and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto 27 were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 16.) No objections have been 28 filed, and the time in which to do so has passed. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, 6 1. 7 8 adopted; 2. 10 prosecute; 3. 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff’s federal claims are dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim, failure to obey the court’s order and failure to 9 11 The findings and recommendations issued on July 21, 2022 (Doc. No. 7) are The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law claims and those claims are dismissed without prejudice; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
