(HC)Ram v. Warden, No. 1:2021cv01520 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 38 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Moot, DENYING Respondent's Motion to Dismiss as Moot, DENYING Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration as Moot, Denying Petitioner's Motion to Supplement as Moot, Denying Petitioner's Motion to Convert, and Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/26/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANTOSH RAM, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:21-cv-01520-JLT-EPG (HC) Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent. 16 17 18 (Docs. 11, 22, 29, 36, 38) 19 20 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT, DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AS MOOT, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CONVERT, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE Santosh Ram is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 2241. The magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that recommended 22 dismissing the petition as moot along with denying Respondent’s motion to dismiss and denying 23 Petitioner’s various motions. (Doc. 38.) Petitioner filed timely objections. (Doc. 39.) 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 25 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner’s 26 objections, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record 27 and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 25, 2023 (Doc. 38) are 1 1 ADOPTED IN FULL. 2 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as moot. 3 3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is DENIED as moot. 4 4. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and motion to supplement (Docs. 22, 29) are 5 DENIED as moot. 6 5. Petitioner’s motion to convert (Doc. 36) is DENIED. 7 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2023 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.