(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous et al, No. 1:2021cv01482 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations in Full 19 ; granting Plaintiff's Motion to withdraw consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge 17 and for Clerk to reflect on the Court's record that Plaintiff has declined Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/27/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARLIN PENN, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:18-cv-01482-AWI-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. Nos. 48, 52) WARDEN OF KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Marlin Penn is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. 21 On June 8, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 22 recommending the denial of Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Doc. No. 52 at 1-5. 23 The findings and recommendations served on Plaintiff provided him fourteen days to file 24 objections. Id. at 1, 5. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time for doing so has now passed. 25 See docket. 26 Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of 27 this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court concludes the findings and 28 recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 ORDER 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 5 The findings and recommendations issued on June 8, 2022 (Doc. No. 52) are ADOPTED in full; and, 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 48) is DENIED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 27, 2022 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
