(PC) Carlisle v. Kern Valley State Prison et al, No. 1:2021cv01286 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee in Full Within Twenty-One (21) Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/16/2021. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TEVIN DOUGLAS CARLISLE, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 1:21-cv-01286-NONE-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE $402.00 FILING FEE (Doc. Nos. 6, 10) Plaintiff Tevin Douglas Carlisle is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 6, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and plaintiff be 23 directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee. (Doc. No. 10.) The findings and recommendations were served 24 on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days. (Id. at 3.) No objections 25 were filed and the time to do so has passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and 28 recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, the court orders that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed on October 6, 2021 (Doc. No. 10), are adopted in 3 full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6) is denied; and 5 3. Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee within twenty days from the date of service of this 6 order or the action will be dismissed without further notice. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
