Corral v. California Highway Patrol et al, No. 1:2021cv00822 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action due to Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey Court Orders signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/06/2021. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN CORRAL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 1:21-cv-00822-DAD-JLT v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS Defendants. 16 (Doc. No. 6) 17 Plaintiff John Corral, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on May 20, 2021. (Doc. 18 19 No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 26, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey court 23 orders and failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 6.) The pending findings and 24 recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 25 to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 4.) To date, no objections to the 26 findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 3 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly: 5 1. 6 7 adopted in full; 2. 8 9 10 11 The findings and recommendations issued on October 26, 2021 (Doc. No. 6) are This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey court orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 6, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
