(PC) Garces v. Gamboa et al, No. 1:2021cv00392 - Document 194 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 175 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/30/2023.(Maldonado, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS MANUEL GARCES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00392-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 14 v. (Docs. 169, 175). M. GAMBOA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Luis Manuel Garces filed a motion for an order under the All Writs Act. (Doc. 169.) The 19 assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s 20 motion be denied. (Doc. 175.) 21 The Court provided the parties an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 22 recommendations. On September 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed objections that were docketed as 23 “Objections to Findings and Recommendations 175.” (Doc. 176.) However, on review, these 24 objections are dated August 27, 2023, (id. at 1), and address various orders issued by the 25 magistrate judge. Plaintiff has since filed other objections (Docs. 178 & 182), but these objections 26 do not specifically address Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief at issue in the magistrate 27 judge’s findings and recommendations. The Court has addressed Plaintiff’s other objections in a 28 separate order. 1 1 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de 2 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court 4 ORDERS: 5 1. 6 7 The findings and recommendations issued on September 11, 2023 (Doc. 175), are ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. Plaintiff’s request for an order under the All Writs Act (Doc. 169) is DENIED. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2023 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
