(PC) Rivas v. Padilla et al, No. 1:2021cv00212 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Case without prejudice for failure to obey court order, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 06/2/2022. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL J. RIVAS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 PADILLA et al., 15 16 17 Defendants. 1:21-cv-00212-JLT-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL (Doc. 12.) ORDER DISMISSING CASE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER (Doc. 10.) ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 18 19 20 21 Daniel J. Rivas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 22 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 23 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 24 On April 28, 2022, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 25 this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order. (Doc. 26 12.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and 27 recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen-day time period has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed 28 objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 3 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 6 1. 7 8 2022 (Doc. 12), are adopted in full; 2. 9 10 The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 28, This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 2, 2022 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.