(PC) Jackson v. Harmon, No. 1:2021cv00143 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Action, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/7/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAZZ ANDRE JACKSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:21-cv-00143-DAD-SAB (PC) v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION J. HARMON, 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 10) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Chazz Andrew Jackson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred 20 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 22, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 21 22 recommending that plaintiff’s claims be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief 23 may be granted. (Doc. No. 10.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any 24 25 objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. (Doc. 26 No. 10 at 4.) To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed with 27 the court, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, 5 1. 6 The findings and recommendations issued on March 22, 2021 (Doc. No. 10) are adopted in full; 7 2. This action is dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim; and 8 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 7, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.