(PC) Foster v. Tulare County Sheriff's Department et al, No. 1:2020cv01596 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations, and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants,signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/5/2021. David Larios (Director of Nursing at Tulare County Detention Facility) and Wellpath (Medical Provider at Tulare County Detention Facility) dismissed. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONAS B. FOSTER 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01596-NONE-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (Doc. No. 15) 18 Plaintiff Jonas B. Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On January 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that this action proceed on plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim against defendants 23 doctor Alla Liberstein and the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department. (Doc. No. 15.) The findings and 24 recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within 25 fourteen (14) days. (Id. at 2.) No objections were filed and the time to do so has expired. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de 27 novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 28 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. adopted in full; 3 4 2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim against defendants Doctor Alla Liberstein and the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department; and 5 6 The findings and recommendations issued on January 19, 2021 (Doc. No. 15), are 3. All others claims and defendants are dismissed from the action. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.