(PC) Castro v. Waddle, No. 1:2020cv01454 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/12/2021. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL Z. CASTRO, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:20-cv-01454-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. WADDLE, (Doc. Nos. 22, 24) Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Daniel Z. Castro is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 9, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. No. 22.) Plaintiff 21 requested an order granting him single cell status and prohibiting him from being placed in any 22 other facility or housing unit unless for medical reasons. (Id.) On April 28, 2021, the assigned 23 magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for 24 injunctive relief be denied without prejudice on numerous grounds, including that plaintiff is 25 asking for injunctive relief not tied to the claims in this case. (Doc. No. 24.) Those findings and 26 recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 27 to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service. (Id. at 6.) No objections have been filed, 28 and the deadline to do so has expired. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 3 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, 6 1. The findings and recommendations entered on April 28, 2021 (Doc. No. 24) are 7 8 9 10 11 adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 22) is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 12, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.