(PC) Ibarra v. Robles et al, No. 1:2020cv01433 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in Full; ORDER DISMISSING This Case Without Prejudice for Plaintiff's Failure to Obey Court Order; ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/10/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM JESSE IBARRA, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 1:20-cv-01433-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL (ECF No. 8.) vs. ROBLES, et al., Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING THIS CASE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER (ECF No. 6.) ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 18 19 20 21 22 23 Adam Jesse Ibarra (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 24 with this civil rights case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 25 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 26 On April 18, 2022, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this 27 case be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order. (ECF 28 No. 8.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and 1 1 recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen-day time period has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed 2 objections or any other response to the findings and recommendations.1 3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 4 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 5 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 9 2022, are adopted in full; 2. 10 11 The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on April 18, This action is dismissed, without prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2022 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 On April 27, 2022, the findings and recommendations were returned in the mail by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. A notice on the envelope stated: Undeliverable, Not in Custody. (Court Record.) Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f). 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
