(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp. et al, No. 1:2020cv01288 - Document 71 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 68 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Plaintiff's Tenth and Eleventh 65 67 Motions for Temporary Restraining Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/11/2023. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp. et al Doc. 71 Case 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO Document 71 Filed 01/11/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., Defendants. 16 No. 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S TENTH AND ELEVENTH MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (Doc. No. 68) 17 18 Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 30, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 21 22 recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s tenth and eleventh motions (Doc. Nos. 65 & 67) 23 for temporary restraining order be denied. (See Doc. No. 68.) Plaintiff did not file objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 24 25 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 26 recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 // 28 // Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO Document 71 Filed 01/11/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 30, 2022 (Doc. No. 68) are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. 4 Plaintiff’s tenth motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 65) is DENIED; and 5 3. 6 Plaintiff’s eleventh motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 67) is DENIED. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 11, 2023 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.