(PC) Henderson v. Castillo et al, No. 1:2020cv01199 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Claims and Defendant, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 04/19/2021. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due within Fourteen Days. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. S. CASTILLO, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01199-AWI-SKO (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND DEFENDANT 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 On March 12, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states 18 cognizable claims of deliberate indifference to health or safety under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 19 cognizable claims under the California Bane Civil Rights Act (“Bane Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 20 52.1, against Defendants Castillo and Tyler in their individual capacities. (Doc. 20.) The Court, 21 therefore, directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his 22 pleading, or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable and 23 to dismiss the remaining claims and defendant. (Id. at 10-11.) 24 On April 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice that “he will proceed . . . on the claims found 25 cognizable. . . .” (Doc. 23.) Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s screening 26 order (Doc. 20), the Court RECOMMENDS that: 27 1. Defendant Flores be DISMISSED; and, 28 2. The claims in Plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED, except for the deliberate 1 indifference claims under section 1983 and the claims under the Bane Act against 2 Defendants Castillo and Tyler in their individual capacities. 3 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days of 5 the date of service of these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections 6 with the Court. The document should be captioned, “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 7 and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver 8 of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. 9 Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 19, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.