(PC) Fregia v. Chen et al, No. 1:2020cv01024 - Document 112 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, 111 Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/7/2023. Objections to F&R due no later than 8/10/2023. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK A. FREGIA, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. YUCUI CHEN, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:20-cv-01024-ADA-EPG (PC) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 111). 16 17 18 On August 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file objections to 19 the Court’s July 14, 2023 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 111). Plaintiff states that he 20 received the Court’s findings and recommendations on July 20, 2023, and so he had until August 21 3, 2023, to file objections. (Id., p. 1). Plaintiff seeks an additional ten-day extension to file 22 objections. (Id., p. 2). Plaintiff apparently relies on the prison mailbox rule, which states that a 23 prisoner’s pleading or filing is “deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for 24 mailing to the relevant court.” Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988); Huizar v. Carey, 273 25 F.3d 1220, 1222 (9th Cir. 2001). “The prison mailbox rule applies to outgoing legal filings or 26 documents sent by Plaintiff, not to incoming legal filings or documents served on Plaintiff.” Scott 27 v. Palmer, No. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO (PC), 2014 WL 6685813, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 28 1 1 2014). Because the findings and recommendations were filed and conventionally served to 2 Plaintiff on July 14, 2023, Plaintiffs objections were due July 31, 2023—not August 3, 2023. 3 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (extending service time by three days where service is made by mail). 4 Based on this date, the Court will grant Plaintiff a ten-day extension to file objections to the 5 Court’s findings and recommendations. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the Court’s findings and recommendations (ECF No. 107) by no later than August 10, 2023. 2. In granting this extension, the Court does not extend Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. As ordered on July 14, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a response or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion by no later than September 12, 2023. (See ECF No. 107, p. 12) (“Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within sixty-days following the date of this order.”). 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2023 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.