Purnell v. Equifax Inc. et al, No. 1:2020cv00805 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/7/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:20-cv-00805-DAD-BAM v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EQUIFAX INC., et al., (Doc. No. 4) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil 17 18 action on June 8, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) On July 7, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened 19 plaintiff’s complaint and issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this 20 action with prejudice. (Doc. No. 4.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff 21 with instructions that any objections thereto must be filed within fourteen (14) days after service 22 of the order. (Id.) The time for objections has passed and no objections have been filed.1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this court has conducted a 23 24 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the 25 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 27 28 1 In lieu of objections, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on August 14, 2020. (Doc. No. 6.) The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on September 17, 2020 and issued its formal mandate on October 9, 2020. (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. 3 The findings and recommendations issued on July 7, 2020 (Doc. No. 4) are adopted in full; 4 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 7, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
