(PC) Beck v. Pallares et al, No. 1:2020cv00760 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign a District Judge to This Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action for Failure to Comply With a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/2020. Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHERRY BECK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. M. PALLARES, et.al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00760-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF Nos. 5, 6) Plaintiff Sherry Beck is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Plaintiff filed the instant action on June 1, 2020. On June 2, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff 21 to submit a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty 22 days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order. Therefore, on July 14, 2020, the 23 Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why the action should not be dismissed. 24 (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not filed a response to the order to show cause and the time to do so has 25 expired. Plaintiff was warned that dismissal would occur if he failed to obey the order. 26 A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or a completed 27 application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Based on Plaintiff’s failure to 28 comply with the Court’s order, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) 1 1 Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a Fresno 2 3 District Judge to this action. Further, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for 4 5 failure to pay the filing fee or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 6 7 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days 8 after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, Plaintiff may file written objections with 9 the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 10 Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 11 result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) 12 (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: 16 August 7, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.