(PC) Davis v. Agundez et al, No. 1:2020cv00640 - Document 62 (E.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 61 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's 58 Motion or Request to Revoke Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 05/30/2023. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORNELL DAVIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. A. AGUNDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. No. 1:20-cv-00640-ADA-CDB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION OR REQUEST TO REVOKE STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF Nos. 58, 61) 16 17 Plaintiff Cornell Davis (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this closed civil rights action 18 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 19, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 21 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion or request to revoke the stipulation for voluntary dismissal 22 with prejudice should be denied. (ECF No. 61.) The parties were afforded fourteen days within 23 which to file any objections. (Id.) No objections have been filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 25 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 26 recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 // 28 // 1 Accordingly, 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 19, 2023, (ECF No. 61), are 3 4 ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion or request to revoke the stipulation for voluntary dismissal, (ECF No. 5 6 58), is DENIED; and 3. The action remains closed. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 30, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
