(PC) Del Rosario v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles et al, No. 1:2020cv00512 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations Regarding Dismissal of Action for Failure to State a Claim, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/28/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEDWIN Q. DEL ROSARIO, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Doc. No. 12) Defendants. 16 17 Case No. 1:20-cv-00512-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff Ledwin Q. Del Rosario (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local 20 Rule 302. 21 On November 18, 2020, the assigned Magistrate Judge screened the first-amended 22 complaint and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed 23 based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. Doc. 24 No. 12. Those findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 25 any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen days after service. Id. at 6. No objections 26 have been filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 1 1 the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 4 1. 5 6 are adopted in full; 2. 7 8 The findings and recommendations issued on November 18, 2020 (Doc. No. 12), This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
