(PC) Hearns v. Whisnand et al, No. 1:2020cv00313 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 13 Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/27/2021. Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE L. HEARNS, et al., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. ANDREW WHISNAND, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:20-cv-00313-JLT (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION 14-DATE DEADLINE Clerk of Court to assign district judge. 16 17 Clarence L. Hearns filed a first amended complaint alleging that the defendants interfered 18 with his mail and access to the court in violation of the First Amendment. (Doc. 13.) The Court 19 screened the amended complaint and determined that Plaintiff failed to state a claim on which 20 relief may be granted. (Doc. 17.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended 21 complaint and advised that that if he did not want to amend, he could instead file a notice of 22 voluntary dismissal or forego amendment and notify the Court that he wishes to stand on his 23 complaint. (Id. at 8.) The Court advised: “If the last option is chosen, the undersigned will issue 24 findings and recommendations to dismiss the complaint without leave to amend, plaintiff will have an 25 opportunity to object, and the matter will be decided by a District Judge.” (Id.) 26 Plaintiff filed a response electing to waive his option to amend his complaint a second time 27 and to stand on his first amended complaint as screened. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff added: “Please move 28 forward with your scheduled issuing of your Report and Recommendation, to have this action 1 terminated.” Id. 2 Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s screening order (Doc. 17), the 3 Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint be DISMISSED for failure to 4 state a claim and DIRECT the Clerk of Court to close the case. 5 6 The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this case for the consideration of these findings and recommendations and case closure. 7 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 8 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after being 9 served with these Findings and Recommendations, the parties may file written objections with the 10 Court. The document should be captioned, “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 11 Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 12 may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 13 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 27, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.