(PC) Archuleta v. Jong et al, No. 1:2019cv01799 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/21/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FREDERICK ARCHULETA, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-01799-NONE-EPG (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. No. 13) JONG, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Frederick Archuleta (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 19 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 20 States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 11, 2020, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and 22 recommendations, recommending that “[t]his action be dismissed, without prejudice, based on 23 Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order,” and that “[t]he Clerk of 24 Court be directed to close this case.” (Doc. No. 13 at 3.) 25 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 26 recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has not filed 27 objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 28 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 3 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on March 11, 2020 (Doc. No. 13), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 7 8 2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order; and 9 10 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
