(PC) Shikeb Saddozai v. Hosey et al, No. 1:2019cv01611 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/2021. Case is Referred Back to Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHIKEB SADDOZAI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 K. HOSEY, et al., 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 23, 28) 16 17 No. 1:19-cv-01611-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff Shikeb Saddozai is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 24, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 recommending that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 23) be denied. 22 (Doc. No. 28.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained 23 notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service. 24 (Id. at 5.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. 3 The findings and recommendations issued on March 24, 2021 (Doc. No. 28) are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 23) is denied; and 5 3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings 6 7 8 consistent with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.