(PC) Little v. Ribera et al, No. 1:2019cv01563 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/18/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN LITTLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:19-cv-01563-DAD-EPG (PC) v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. RIBERA, et al., (Doc. No. 14) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Shawn Little is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 17 18 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 14, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 20 21 recommending that this case be dismissed, with prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failures to state a 22 claim, comply with a court order, and prosecute this case. (Doc. No. 14.) Plaintiff was provided 23 twenty-one (21) days from the date of service to file objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. (Id. at 8.) Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the deadline to do so has 25 passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 27 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. 3 4 adopted in full; 2. 5 6 7 8 The findings and recommendations issued on July 14, 2020 (Doc. No. 14) are This case is dismissed, with prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failures to state a claim, comply with a court order, and prosecute this case; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.