(PC)Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al, No. 1:2019cv01489 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/19/19. Objections due within SIXTY (60) DAYS. (Orozco, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EDWARD THOMAS, 11 12 v. 13 14 Case No. 1:19-cv-01489-LJO-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. PFEIFFER, et al., 15 (ECF NO. 7) Defendants. 16 Edward Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 17 18 action. On December 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file 19 20 objections to the findings and recommendations dated November 18, 2019. (ECF No. 7). 21 Plaintiff states that he needs an extension because his personal typewriter is broken, because he 22 does not currently have access to legal property that he needs to adequately object to the findings 23 and recommendations, and because he is going to be transported to a different institution for a 24 court hearing. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 2 ORDERED that Plaintiff has sixty days from the date of service of this order to file his objections 3 to the findings and recommendations dated November 18, 2019. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 19, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
