(PC) Lewis v. Welsh et al, No. 1:2019cv01468 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations; ORDERED DENYING 37 Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/8/2021. CASE REMAINS CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE LEWIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WELCH, 15 No. 1:19-cv-01468-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 37, 40) 16 17 Tyrone Lewis (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this action filed on October 17, 2019. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 This case settled (Doc. No. 35) and was closed (Doc. No. 36.) On November 1, 2021, 21 plaintiff filed what the court construes as a motion to enforce the settlement agreement. (Doc. 22 No. 37.) On November 12, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and 23 recommendations, recommending “that Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement 24 (ECF No. 37) be denied.” (Doc. No. 40 at 2.) 25 26 The parties were provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and no objections have been filed. 27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 28 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 1 1 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, 4 1. 5 The findings and recommendations issued on November 12, 2021, (Doc. No. 40), are adopted in full; and Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement, (Doc. No. 37), is denied. 6 2. 7 This case shall remain closed. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.