(PC) Solvey v. Gates et al, No. 1:2019cv01444 - Document 103 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations in full 95 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/26/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY H. SOLVEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 S. GATES, et al., 15 No. 1:19-cv-01444 JLT GSA (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL (ECF No. 95) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 11, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed by October 4, 2023. (ECF No. 95). Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. Thus the Court ORDERS: 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued September 11, 2023 (ECF No. 95), are 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff’s surreply / motion for a finding of perjury and sanctions, docketed December 15, 2022 (ECF No. 78), is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, docketed June 9, 2022 (ECF No. 53), is DENIED; 4. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, filed June 27, 2022 (ECF No. 55), is GRANTED, and 5. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and CLOSE this case. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 26, 2023 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.