(PC) Montenegro v. CDCR-Medical, No. 1:2019cv01440 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/23/19. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN MONTENEGRO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 1:19-cv-01440-AWI-GSA-PC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED (ECF No. 2.) vs. CDCR-MEDICAL, 15 Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 16 17 18 19 I. FINDINGS 20 Juan Montenegro (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 21 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on 22 October 15, 2019, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 24 In his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff claims that during the past year he 25 received money from several sources and owns property valued at $40 million.. (ECF No. 2.) 26 Therefore, it appears from a review of the motion that Plaintiff can afford the costs of this action. 27 Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, and Plaintiff should be required 28 to pay the statutory filing fee of $400.00 for this action in full. 1 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION 2 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 3 1. 4 Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on October 15, 2019, be DENIED; and 5 2. 6 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 7 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 8 (14) days after the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file 9 written objections with the court. Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action in full. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 10 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 11 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 12 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 23, 2019 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.