Hamilton v. Bagdesorian et al, No. 1:2019cv00925 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING ACTION signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/1/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NANCY D. HAMILTON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:19-cv-00925-AWI-SAB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION v. GARY G. BAGDESORIAN, et al., (ECF No. 5) Defendants. 16 17 Nancy D. Hamilton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 19, 2019, the magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations 21 recommending that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to comply with a 22 July 11, 2019 screening order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The findings and 23 recommendations was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 24 to be filed within thirty days from the date of service. The period for filing objections has passed 25 and no objections have been filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 27 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the 28 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. FULL; 3 4 2. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the July 11, 2019 screening order; and 5 6 The findings and recommendations, filed August 19, 2019, is ADOPTED IN 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this matter. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: October 1, 2019 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.