(PC) Fairfield v. Corpuz et al, No. 1:2019cv00632 - Document 74 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 71 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 47 , 54 Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/2021. Case is Referred Back to Magistrate Judge. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, 12 13 14 No. 1:19-cv-00632-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, v. ALBERT KHOO, et al., 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 47, 54, 71) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Melissa Fairfield is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 25, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 47, 54) be 23 denied. (Doc. No. 71.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and 24 contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date 25 of service. (Id. at 4–5.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so 26 has now passed. 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 1 1 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, 4 1. 5 6 adopted in full; 2. 7 8 11 Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 47, 54) are denied; and 3. 9 10 The findings and recommendations issued on March 25, 2021 (Doc. No. 71) are This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.