Brown et al v. The City of Clovis et al, No. 1:2019cv00465 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action for Failure to Comply and Failure to Prosecute signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/04/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYQUAN RAY BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:19-cv-00465-LJO-SAB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. THE CITY OF CLOVIS, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendants. 15 16 17 Rayquan Ray Brown and Lafrance Ray Brown (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate 19 judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 28, 2019, the magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations 21 recommending dismissing this action for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with court orders and 22 failure to prosecute. The findings and recommendations was served on Plaintiffs and contained 23 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty 24 days from the date of service. The period for filing objections has passed and no objections have 25 been filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 27 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the 28 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. FULL; 3 4 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute; and 5 6 The findings and recommendations, filed August 28, 2019, is ADOPTED IN 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ October 4, 2019 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.