(PC) Cramer v. Estrada et al, No. 1:2019cv00112 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Pay the Required Filing Fee and Obey a Court Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORENZO D. CRAMER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:19-cv-00112-DAD-JLT (PC) v. R. ESTRADA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PAY THE REQUIRED FILING FEE AND OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. No. 6) 17 18 Plaintiff Lorenzo D. Cramer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 24, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 23 recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to comply 24 with the court’s July 1, 2019 order which required plaintiff to either pay the required filing fee to 25 proceed with this action or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 6; see also 26 Doc. No. 5.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice 27 that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 6 at 28 ///// 1 1 1–2.) The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has failed to file objections or 2 otherwise communicate with the court regarding this action. 3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 4 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 5 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 6 Accordingly: 7 1. 8 9 in full; 2. 10 11 12 13 14 The September 24, 2019 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 6) are adopted This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the required filing fee and failure to obey a court order; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.