Todd Fisher v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., No. 1:2018cv01704 - Document 51 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: Order GRANTING stipulation for extension of time to file objections to Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/12/2021. (Filing Deadline: 5/14/2021)(Rosales, O.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 TODD FISHER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 1:18-cv-1704-NONE-EPG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC., Defendant. 16 (ECF No. 50) 17 Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend the time to file objections to the 18 19 Court’s findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 50.) 20 On April 5, 2021, the Court entered findings and recommendations recommending that 21 Plaintiff Todd Fisher’s motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement be denied. 22 23 24 (ECF No. 49.) The parties were provided an opportunity to file objections within fourteen days. (Id.) The parties’ stipulation, filed on April 9, 2021, requests an extension of the objection deadline to May 14, 20211 due to counsel’s respective workloads. (Id.) The Court finds good cause to grant the requested extension of time. 25 /// 26 27 28 1 The stipulation is somewhat unclear and identifies the proposed extended deadline as May 14, 2021, and May 6, 2021, in different paragraphs. Out of caution, the Court construes the stipulation as requesting the later deadline. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation for an extension of time (ECF 2 No. 50) is GRANTED. The deadline for the parties file objections to the Court’s findings and 3 recommendations entered on April 5, 2021 (ECF No. 49) is extended to May 14, 2021. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: April 12, 2021 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.