Jewell v. Francis III et al, No. 1:2018cv01460 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER WITHDRAWING 6 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER GRANTING IN PART 7 Motion to Serve Via Publication, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/4/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 KAREN JEWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) WILLIAM MONCRIEF FRANCIS III, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01460 DAD JLT ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6) ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO SERVE VIA PUBLICATION (Doc. 7) 16 17 The Court recently ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the matters should not be dismissed 18 due to her failure to prosecute this action and comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 5) The plaintiff 19 failed to respond. Consequently, the Court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss the action. 20 (Doc. 6) The plaintiff ignored the findings and recommendations and, instead, filed a motion for leave 21 to serve by publication. (Doc. 7) 22 The plaintiff reports she has made diligent efforts to serve William Moncrief Francis III, but 23 these efforts have failed. (Doc. 7-2; Doc. 7-1; Doc. 7-6) She seeks to serve Mr. Francis via publication. 24 (Doc. 7) She asserts that service should occur through “The Daily Report” and claims this is a 25 “newspaper of general circulation that is most likely to give notice to Defendant because it circulates 26 in the area of Defendant’s last known address” (Doc. 7 at 1), though she provides no evidence of this 27 assertion. In fact, the Court is aware that The Daily Report is a legal newspaper that is circulated to 28 lawyers and those with an interest in the legal field. The Court has no information that it can be 1 1 purchased at a newsstand, if one does not already have a subscription, no information as to how many 2 non-lawyers subscribe to the publication or how many of the newspaper is distributed in Lebec, 3 California where the plaintiff reports that Mr. Francis Lives. 4 Upon consideration of the filings and evidence of contained in the plaintiff’s application and 5 declaration for this order, and it satisfactorily appearing that Mr. Fancis cannot with reasonable 6 diligence be served in any other manner specified in Sections 415.10 through 415.40 of the Code of 7 Civil Procedure, and that Mr. Francis is a necessary party to this action, the Court ORDERS: 8 1. The findings and recommendation to dismiss the action (Doc. 6) is WITHDRAWN; 9 2. The request for notice by publication is GRANTED in PART. The plaintiff SHALL 10 serve the summons by publication in the “Bakersfield Californian,” a community newspaper of 11 general circulation in Lebec, California and the Court finds is a newspaper most likely to give Mr. 12 Francis actual notice of the action. The publication SHALL be made once a week for four successive 13 weeks. Proof of service SHALL be filed within three days from the last day the publication runs; 14 15 16 17 2. The plaintiff’s deadline to serve Mr. Francis is extended eight weeks from the date of entry of this order; 3. Plaintiff SHALL immediately mail a copy of the summons, the complaint, and this order to Mr. Francis at 3107 Lebec Oaks Road, Lebec, California. 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.