(PC) Davis v. California Correctional Institution Trust Office Officials et al, No. 1:2018cv01393 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/20/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRENCE LAMONT DAVIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION TRUST OFFICE OFFICIALS, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01393-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [ECF Nos. 5, 7, 8, 9, 10] 18 Plaintiff Terrence Lamont Davis is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations 22 recommending that Plaintiff’s October 29, 2018 motion requesting access to the law library be denied. 23 (ECF Nos. 5, 7.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice 24 that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections have been filed and the time to do 25 so has expired. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 On November 14, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 2 Plaintiff’s November 13, 2018 motions for injunctive relief be denied. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) The 3 Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to 4 be filed within fourteen days. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. 5 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 6 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 7 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. 10 11 12 The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 1, 2018 and November 14, 2018, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief, filed on October 29, 2018 (ECF No.5) and November 13, 2018 (ECF Nos. 8, 9), are denied. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: December 20, 2018 16 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2