(PC) Lamarque v. Barcus et al, No. 1:2018cv01234 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED Without Prejudice re 16 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/19/2019. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PORFIRIO LAMARQUE, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. JIM BARCUS, et al, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01234 DAD JLT (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened recently, and he was directed to submit a 18 notice as to whether he wishes to stand on his pleading, to proceed with it as screened, or to file a 19 second amended complaint. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff was provided a thirty-day response period, and he 20 was specifically informed that if he did not submit an amended pleading or a notice, then the 21 Court would recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. The 22 deadline to submit a response has now passed, and plaintiff has not submitted a notice or 23 otherwise responded to the order. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that this action be 24 dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 1 1 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 19, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
