(PC) Berringer v. Uriate et al, No. 1:2018cv01017 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER That Filing Fee Must be Paid Within Thirty (30) Days 2 , 3 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/11/2018. (Hellings, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ANTHONY SCOTT BERRINGER, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 v. S. URIATE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01017-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER THAT FILING FEE MUST BE PAID WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS [Doc. Nos. 2, 3] 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Scott Berringer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 21 Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint on July 27, 2018. (Compl., Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2.) 22 On July 30, 2018, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations 23 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 24 U.S.C. § 1915(g), based on Plaintiff bringing three or more prior actions while incarcerated that were 25 dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 26 (Doc. No. 3.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 27 any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. (Id. at 3-4.) The deadline to file objections 28 has passed, and none were filed. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the undersigned has conducted 2 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the undersigned concludes the 3 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly: 5 1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 30, 2018 (Doc. No. 3) are adopted in full; 6 7 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on July 27, 2018 (Doc. No. 2), is denied; 8 9 3. Plaintiff must pay the $400 filing fee to proceed in this action within thirty (30) days of this order; and 10 11 4. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to pay the filing fee for this action will result in dismissal of this case. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ October 11, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
