(PC) Watkins v. Imlach, et al., No. 1:2018cv01007 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING this Case, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; ORDER for Clerk to CLOSE CASE signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/13/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND CHAD WATKINS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. IMLACH, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 1:18-cv-01007-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 16.) ORDER DISMISSING THIS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 1.) ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 17 18 19 20 21 Raymond Chad Watkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state hospital detainee proceeding pro se and in 22 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred 23 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 24 On September 6, 2019, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 25 this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 26 granted under §1983. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in which to file 27 objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) The time for filing objections has expired, 28 and Plaintiff has not filed objections or any other response to the findings and recommendations. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 5 1. 6 7 September 6, 2019, are adopted in full; 2. 8 9 The Findings and Recommendations entered by the Magistrate Judge on This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2019 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.