(PC) Bonilla v. Dellostritto, No. 1:2018cv00698 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Requiring Payment of Filing Fee in Full Within Twenty-One Days 7 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/19/2018. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MICHAELE DELLOSTRITTO, Defendant. Case No. 1:18-cv-00698-JDP ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS (ECF No. 7) 15 16 17 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson entered findings and 21 recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 22 No. 6) be denied. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was given an opportunity to object to the findings and 23 recommendations within fourteen days. No objection was filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on July 27, 2018, 1 1 2 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) is denied. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ August 19, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.